Physics

Physicists Prove Surprising Rule of Threes

Efimov trimers.

Harald Ritsch/IQOQI

Efimov trimers are states of matter that theoretically come in an infinite range of sizes. Experimentalists recently observed consecutive trimers, verifying the strange theory.

Comments (14)

print

More than 40 years after a Soviet nuclear physicist proposed an outlandish theory that trios of particles can arrange themselves in an infinite nesting-doll configuration, experimentalists have reported strong evidence that this bizarre state of matter is real.

In 1970, Vitaly Efimov was manipulating the equations of quantum mechanics in an attempt to calculate the behavior of sets of three particles, such as the protons and neutrons that populate atomic nuclei, when he discovered a law that pertained not only to nuclear ingredients but also, under the right conditions, to any trio of particles in nature.

Borromean rings.

Courtesy of Cheng Chin

Shih-Kuang Tung of the University of Chicago holding Borromean rings, which have often been used as a symbol of unity. If one ring is removed, all three fall apart.

While most forces act between pairs, such as the north and south poles of a magnet or a planet and its sun, Efimov identified an effect that requires three components to spring into action. Together, the components form a state of matter similar to Borromean rings, an ancient symbol of three interconnected circles in which no two are directly linked. The so-called Efimov “trimer” could consist of a trio of protons, a triatomic molecule or any other set of three particles, as long as their properties were tuned to the right values. And in a surprising flourish, this hypothetical state of matter exhibited an unheard-of feature: the ability to range in size from practically infinitesimal to infinite.

“It’s a pretty wild idea,” said Randy Hulet, a physics professor at Rice University in Houston. “You get this infinite series of molecules.”

Efimov had shown that when three particles come together, a special confluence of their forces creates the Borromean rings effect: Though one is not enough, the effects of two particles can conspire to bind a third. The nesting-doll feature — called discrete scale invariance — arose from a symmetry in the equation describing the forces between three particles. If the particles satisfied the equation when spaced a certain distance apart, then the same particles spaced 22.7 times farther apart were also a solution. This number, called a “scaling factor,” emerged from the mathematics as inexplicably as pi, the ratio between a circle’s circumference and diameter.

“It’s like layers of an onion,” Hulet said. “You see molecules at one layer. Peel the layer away, and you see that there’s a molecule there 22.7 times smaller. Every time you peel away a layer, you find another molecule.”

Efimov published his theory in a Soviet journal as well as the Western publication Physics Letters B. At first, almost no one believed it.

“In the West, these ideas were greeted with great skepticism,” said Eric Braaten, a theoretical physicist at Ohio State University who was in high school when Efimov’s paper appeared.

Theorists waded into the equations in search of an error. But instead, Braaten said, “they became convinced that it was true.”

But even with airtight logic, the theory did not necessarily have to manifest itself in nature. “I thought it was way too weird to have any basis in reality,” said Chris Greene, a physicist at Purdue University who studies “few-body” quantum systems, which consist of only a few particles.

Vitaly Efimov

Flatz/University of Innsbruck

Vitaly Efimov, a professor at the University of Washington — pictured during a visit to Innsbruck, Austria, in 2009 — developed his theory of trimers while working as a nuclear physicist in the Soviet Union in 1970.

And for decades, no one knew whether the theory described real matter. As researchers mulled over where to look for Efimov trimers, Efimov himself emigrated west and became a teaching professor at the University of Washington, where he achieved renown more for shooting a gun in class during a lesson on inelastic collisions than for his outlandish theory.

Because the Efimov state is weakly bound and is usually overpowered by other forces, observing it requires precise tuning. Particles must have the peculiar quantum property of being able to collide when they are far apart, beyond the range of the force between them — a situation analogous to Earth ricocheting off a distant star whose gravity it does not feel. And the particles must have too little energy to wiggle out of formation.

Some physicists suspected that an accidental fine-tuning in nature might cause the Efimov state to arise in the guise of the helium-4 atom and in a carbon isotope called the Hoyle state that forms in stars and begets many other elements. But these nuclei were too complex for controlled studies.

In 1999, Greene realized that the properties necessary for the Efimov state could be tuned by hand in newly developed ultracold optical traps. Atoms inside these apparatuses could be laser-cooled to a fraction of a degree above absolute zero, limiting their wiggling ability, and a magnetic field could be applied to make them collide at great distances.

Rudolf Grimm

Lackner /IQOQI

Rudolf Grimm, an experimental physicist at the University of Innsbruck in Austria, led a team that created two nested Efimov trimers from cesium atoms.

Rudi Grimm and his group at the University of Innsbruck in Austria managed to create an Efimov trimer for the first time in 2006, building it from a trio of cesium atoms cooled to 10-billionths of a degree above absolute zero. It was a long-awaited triumph for Efimov, who, Grimm recalled, became very emotional when he heard the news.

But the result did not decisively prove the theory.

“With just one example, it’s very difficult to tell if it’s a Russian nesting doll,” said Cheng Chin, a professor of physics at the University of Chicago who was part of Grimm’s group in 2006. The ultimate proof would be an observation of consecutive Efimov trimers, each enlarged by a factor of 22.7. “That initiated a new race” to prove the theory, Chin said.

Eight years later, the competition to observe a series of Efimov states has ended in a photo finish. “What you see is three groups, in three different countries, reporting these multiple Efimov states all within about one month,” said Chin, who led one of the groups. “It’s totally amazing.”

Grimm’s team observed a second Efimov trimer made of cesium atoms, reporting the results May 12 in Physical Review Letters. The 2006 trimer spanned the width of 1,000 hydrogen atoms, requiring the new one to measure a full micrometer across — “a gigantic molecule,” Grimm said.

Each 22.7-times larger Efimov state is also 22.7-squared times weaker, requiring the optical trap to be cooled even further to allow the new state to form. Grimm’s group perfected its techniques and detected the state at the very edge of experimental limits.

Meanwhile, the two other groups managed to observe three consecutive Efimov states by taking advantage of a footnote in the theory: When a trimer is built from a mixture of different particles rather than an identical set, the scaling factor of 22.7 decreases according to the particles’ relative masses. In other words, nesting dolls made of atomic mixtures become closer in size, enabling more of them to be observed within the experimental window.

Both Chin’s team and a group led by Matthias Weidemüller at the University of Heidelberg observed Efimov trimers of three different sizes, each made of two cesium atoms and a much lighter lithium atom. Chin’s group posted its paper online in February, and the Heidelberg scientists followed with theirs in March. Both papers, which are still under peer review, reported a scaling factor right around 4.9 for the relative sizes of their trimers — exactly the adjustment to 22.7 predicted by the theory.

Ultracold Atom Trap

Lackner /IQOQI

At the University of Innsbruck in Austria, an optically trapped gas of ultracold cesium atoms is tuned by lasers and a magnetic field to enable the formation of Efimov states.

“We are very excited about this result,” Chin said. “In the complicated molecular world, there’s a new law.”

The law is a geometric progression of evermore-enormous trios of particles, spanning in a theoretically infinite sequence from the quantum scale to (if the particles were cold enough) the size of the universe and beyond. “Although we didn’t see an infinite number of them, there’s pretty strong evidence when you see three in a row,” Chin said.

For some, the results mark the end of an era, as well as a starting point.

“For the classic Efimov scenario, the story is now basically completed,” Grimm said. But as a paradigm for looking at few-body phenomena in cold atoms, he said, “it’s like the tip of the iceberg.”

The Efimov state is the most elementary effect in few-body physics, the researchers said, but there are countless others that seem to influence the arrangements of small numbers of atoms: four-, five- and six-body interactions and so on. Scientists think it might be possible to augment some of these effects in ultracold optical traps to produce new bulk properties of matter, such as exotic forms of superconductivity. An improved understanding of few-body physics would also feed into models of more complex systems involving many more particles.

But direct practical applications of the Efimov state are limited. For the researchers who have studied the odd yet elegant idea for decades, the main driver of the new research, and its chief delight, is having a final proof.

“It is satisfying to really see this magic number, 22.7, coming out,” said Braaten, who was not involved in the new studies. “There was indirect evidence that all this worked, but actually seeing this discrete scaling factor explicitly in experiment — it’s comforting.”

This article was reprinted on Wired.com.

Add a Comment

View Comments (14)

Comments for this entry

  • This was a very interesting article. I have question. How does pi (3.14) relate to the 22.7 number? Maybe if I saw the equation it would help me understand the significance of the number and how it pertains to the formula.
    Thank you.

  • I imagine that this is purely coincidental, but as I visited a search engine to find additional articles on this subject, searching for only the value 22.7, I stumbled upon an article discussing the relationship of the value 22/7 and the value pi. Odd similarities on the surface: 22.7 and 22/7

  • There was no direct relation of pi to the Efimov constant of 22.7 other than it is a new constant relationship for this bonding effect (though it seems to slide on a scale with the mass of the reaction).
    If your first molecule was x in size, then the next stable bond will appear at x*22.7 in size. then again at (x*22.7)*22.7. (please correct me if I am wrong in my understanding of the rticle)

  • The Efimov constant is about 3 + 4 + 5^2/6^2 + 7 + 8 with an error on the order of 6e-5. Easy to remember :)

  • Stolen from reddit:

    For those who are wondering about the exact value of the scaling constant — it can be found in Section 3 of this paper: http://rsta.royalsocietypublishing.org/content/369/1946/2679.full

    Specifically, it’s epi/s, where s is the positive solution to

    s * cosh(pi*s/2) = 8/sqrt(3) * sinh(pi*s/6).

    (In the paper it’s called s_0, I’ve just called it s for simplicity.)

    Thanks to ipsin on Hacker News for pointing this out.

    And it’s not exacty 22.7 FYI it’s 22.69438259536…

  • If you succeed in the binding of the three seperate element will this make a change in the formation of molecules?Since they are held together by attractive bonding .

  • Strangely enough, if you plot the location of the three labs that made the experimental confirmation, they form a triangle. And if you zoom out to a triangle 22.7 times larger, you will find the three granting agencies that made possible the three labs.

  • I am unable to contribute to any detailed scientific discussion related to this subject, but as an engineer I am excited about the continuing analytical research which explores the nature and fundamental state of matter. This is great stuff. If only we can bring these theoretical physics explorations into the awareness of thinkers within our community, then perhaps even more progress can be made.

  • @Toney, I do like how you think. Fun.

    Playing around with the numbers, if you take 22.7 / pi you get 7.22, the mirror image. … ok, its not exact and I had to use a lot of digits on pi, but hey… fun anyway.

  • How does this effect Newtonian Physics? Does it have a fundamental impact? Would this not triangulate the behavior of spheres and create a grouping where there was only singularity previously?

  • Jon, while there might be some potential with gravitation, as the article states:
    “Because the Efimov state is weakly bound and is usually overpowered by other forces, observing it requires precise tuning.”

    As I understand, the effect has so far been demonstrated for the strong and EM particle binding interactions.

    While particles certainly respond to gravitational fields, I don’t think there’s any experimental evidence that discrete particles can produce any gravitational effect. I don’t know what the lower limit of mass that has been observed to produce gravitational effects is, but I think that makes controlled experiments infeasible.
    Laser cooling widely separated asteroids is probably not an option.
    <%)

  • Worth adding that the s0-called triple alpha process responsible for carbon-based life – and made famous through Fred Hoyle’s predictionof a necessary resonance on anthropic grounds – appears to be a consequence of Efimov states.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Your name will appear near your comment. Required *

Quanta Magazine moderates all comments with the goal of facilitating an informed, substantive, civil conversation about the research developments we cover. Comments that are abusive, profane, self-promotional, misleading, incoherent or off-topic will be rejected. We can only accept comments that are written in English.