We care about your data, and we'd like to use cookies to give you a smooth browsing experience. Please agree and read more about our privacy policy.
Quanta Homepage
  • Physics
  • Mathematics
  • Biology
  • Computer Science
  • Topics
  • Archive
The Mathematics of Juggling
Comment
Read Later
Share
Facebook
Twitter
Copied!
Copy link
Email
Pocket
Reddit
Ycombinator
Flipboard
    • Comment
      Comments
    • Read Later
    Abstractions blog

    The Mathematics of Juggling

    By Jennifer Ouellette

    May 24, 2017

    Juggling has advanced enormously in recent decades, thanks in part to the mathematical study of possible patterns.
    Comment
    Read Later

    George Hart for the Simons Foundation

    By Jennifer Ouellette

    Contributing Writer


    May 24, 2017


    View PDF/Print Mode
    Abstractions blogmathematicsAll topics

    Introduction

    The late computer scientist Claude Shannon has a well-deserved reputation as the father of information theory, but he was also an avid unicyclist, juggler and tinkerer. He even built his own robotic juggling machine out of parts from an Erector set, programming it to juggle three metal balls by bouncing them against a drum.

    In the early 1980s, Shannon published the first formal mathematical theorem of juggling, correlating the length of time balls are in the air with how long each ball stays in the juggler’s hand. His theorem demonstrated the importance of hand speed to successful juggling.

    Mathematicians have been fascinated by juggling ever since. “I think it’s a matter of making sense of the order that’s in the juggling patterns,” said Jonathan Stadler, a math professor at Capital University in Ohio who started juggling as a teenager. “It has to do with understanding how things fit together.”

    In essence, juggling comes down to simple projectile motion, with each ball following a neat parabolic arc as it is tossed — except that there are multiple balls following interweaving paths in periodically repeating patterns. For a single juggler, there are three basic patterns: the cascade, in which an odd number of balls are tossed from one hand to the other; the fountain, in which an even number of balls are juggled in two separate columns; and the shower, in which all the balls are tossed in a circle. A more experienced juggler might throw more than one object from a single hand at the same time, a practice known as multiplexing.

    There are many possible combinations of throws, so how do jugglers decide which ones will produce a valid pattern? They do so by means of a mathematical notation system called site swaps that links each ball thrown to how long it stays in the air, describing this in terms of “beats.”

    For example, a one-beat throw means the juggler simply passes the ball from one hand to the other. If the ball is tossed into the air, the height it reaches determines how long it takes for the ball to return to the juggler’s hand — two beats, three beats, or more. The more beats, the higher the ball must be thrown to maintain the pattern. Thanks to the availability of online animation tools, a juggler can see what a given pattern will look like before attempting the trick in the physical world.

    Ultimately, juggling holds an aesthetic as well as intellectual appeal for the mathematician. “The way that I feel when I look at a nice equation is the same way I feel when I look at a nice juggling pattern,” said Burkard Polster of Australia’s Monash University, who literally wrote the book on the mathematics of juggling in 2002. “There’s nothing superfluous there.”

    About the Video

    Juggling has advanced enormously in recent decades, since mathematicians began systematically investigating the possible patterns of non-colliding throws. As a result of this research, many new possibilities have been discovered for jugglers to attempt. In addition, the connections between juggling and the algebra of braids provide another way to analyze juggling. (Related: More videos from the Mathematical Impressions series.)

    — George Hart

    Editor’s note: This post was originally published on May 9, 2013.

    This article was reprinted in Spanish at Investigacionyciencia.es.

    Share this article
    Facebook
    Twitter
    Copied!
    Copy link
    Email
    Pocket
    Reddit
    Ycombinator
    Flipboard

    Newsletter

    Get Quanta Magazine delivered to your inbox

    Recent newsletters
    By Jennifer Ouellette

    Contributing Writer


    May 24, 2017


    View PDF/Print Mode
    Abstractions blogmathematicsAll topics
    Share this article
    Facebook
    Twitter
    Copied!
    Copy link
    Email
    Pocket
    Reddit
    Ycombinator
    Flipboard

    Newsletter

    Get Quanta Magazine delivered to your inbox

    Recent newsletters
    The Quanta Newsletter

    Get highlights of the most important news delivered to your email inbox

    Recent newsletters

    Comment on this article

    Quanta Magazine moderates comments to facilitate an informed, substantive, civil conversation. Abusive, profane, self-promotional, misleading, incoherent or off-topic comments will be rejected. Moderators are staffed during regular business hours (New York time) and can only accept comments written in English. 

    Is a spiderweb part of the animal’s mind?

    Next article

    The Thoughts of a Spiderweb
    Quanta Homepage
    Facebook
    Twitter
    Youtube
    Instagram

    • About Quanta
    • Archive
    • Contact Us
    • Terms & Conditions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Simons Foundation
    All Rights Reserved © 2023